Ishverlal Madanlal & Co. v. SS Vishva Mangal
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, solely as to plaintiff “Director General of the India Supply Mission for and on behalf of The President of the Union of India” (hereinafter “Supply Mission”), pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., on the ground that there exists between plaintiff Supply Mission and defendants, no real “ease or controversy” over which the Court may exercise jurisdiction under Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution.
There are no disputed issues of material fact. Plaintiffs are the owners of mixed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.