Legal Opinion

Beaverton School District 48J v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 2016No. C124262CV; A156258PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

Defendants, David Ward, Hal Ward, and Ward Properties, LLC (collectively, the Wards), appeal a supplemental judgment awarding them attorney fees in an amount less than they requested. Plaintiff, Beaverton School District (the school district), condemned the Wards’ property through the exercise of its powers of eminent domain. Although the parties disputed the valuation of the condemned property, they eventually settled the case after an offer to compromise. The offer left determination of attorney fees to the court. The court awarded the Wards’ fees in a supplemental judgment. They appeal,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Assn. v. ChinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Mayes v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Mayes v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API