Legal Opinion

De Jaray v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 7, 2025No. 3:19-cv-00086Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON STEVEN A.W. DE JARAY, PERIENNE Case No. 3:19-cv-86-SI DE JARAY, DARRELL R. OSWALD, and APEX-MICRO MANUFACTURING ORDER CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20, Defendants. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Mr. Steven de Jaray, Ms. Perienne de Jaray, and Mr. Darrell R. Oswald (collectively, the “Individual Plaintiffs”) sued Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (“Lattice”), alleging state and federal law claims arising from a business relationship between Lattice and Apex-Micro…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API