Legal Opinion
Kohner v. National Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1930No. Docket No. 7258PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
This action was commenced by the plaintiffs to recover from the defendant the sum of $2,500 alleged to be due them upon a policy of insurance. The insurance is what is commonly called “burglary insurance.”
The policy upon which this action is based recites in substance that in consideration of $52.25 premium and of the declarations thereinafter contained, which the assured warrants to be true and which are to be construed as conditions precedent, the defendant agrees to indemnify Milton J. Kohner in the sum of $5,000 for the term of twelve months, beginning on the first…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wheaton v. North British and Merchantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Dam v. ZinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sullivan v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Joyce v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.