Legal Opinion
Reese Design, Inc. v. I-94 Highway 61 Eastview Center Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 23, 1988No. C8-87-2392PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order for judgment denying the claim of appellant Reese Design, Inc. for fees due pursuant to a contract with a developer. Reese asserts that it was authorized to prepare final plans and specifications and should be paid for services rendered, and further that it is entitled to relief on the basis of the doctrine of account stated due to the failure of respondent CHK Partnership to object to the billings.
The trial court found that Reese was not authorized to prepare final plans and specifications, that the doctrine of account stated was not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Orvis v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Vanderweyst v. LangfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- American Druggists Insurance v. Thompson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Marriage of WeinsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Krogness v. Best Buy Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third partyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.