Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Dudley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Bane County. The facts are stated in the opinion. The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. They contended, inter alia, that the homestead estate which descended to defendant was a freehold estate which gave her seizin. -1 Kent’s Comm. 26; 1 Washb.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Bane County. The facts are stated in the opinion. The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. They contended, inter alia, that the homestead estate which descended to defendant was a freehold estate which gave her seizin. -1 Kent’s Comm. 26; 1 Washb. Real Prop. 87, 88, and note 5; Coke, Litt. 42 contended, inter alia, that the necessary effect of this secret transaction, if the deed were valid, would be to defeat the plaintiff’s marital rights and just expectations as the wife of Charles L. Dudley. The logical inference of fact from the…

1Opinion of the CourtORton, J.

The facts of this case are substantially as follows: William II. Dudley died on the 2d day of July, 1879, seized of lots 7 and 8, and the east twenty-five feet of lots 6 and 9, in block 7, in the city of Madison. On lot 8 and the east twenty-live feet of lot 9 there was a dwelling-house, where he lived and died. He left also a personal estate which, after the payment of all debts and expenses, amounted to the sum of over $26,000, one half of which was assigned to the defendant as his widow, and the other half to his son, Charles L. Dudley, on the 12th day of February, 1880, the whole of which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hafer v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Browning v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Chandler v. HollingsworthCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1867
  4. Hamilton v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Holbrook v. WightmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. York v. TriggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Whitehill v. ThiessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  5. Noah v. NoahMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API