Legal Opinion

Republic of China v. Pang-Tsu Mow

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 10, 1951No. Civ. 4741-51PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKLAND, District Judge.

In this case plaintiff filed a complaint for an accounting and an injunction against the defendants to require them to account for records and funds of the Chinese Air Force Office in the United States of America. Lieutenant General Pang-Tsu Mow, Deputy Chief of the Chinese Air Force, was appointed by the Republic of China to head the Chinese Air Force Office in the United States. Lieutenant Colonel Ve-Shuen Hsiang was appointed as his executive of ficer. In their official capacity they were intrusted with large sums of money by the Republic of China to conduct a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co. v. American Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  5. Sullivan v. State of Sao PauloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aquamar S.A. v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Pang-Tsu Mow v. Republic of China (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. In re Investigation of World Arrangements with Relation to the Production, Transportation, Refining & Distribution of PetroleumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  4. Republic of China v. Pong-Tsu MowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. Aquamar S.A. v. Del Monte FreshCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API