Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. State of Sao Paulo
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1941No. 1457PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion made on behalf of the defendant, The State of Sao Paulo, one of the Federated States of the United States of Brazil and by the Government of the United States of Brazil appearing specially, to dismiss the. complaint and vacate the warrant of attachment and the order for the publication of the summons based thereon. The action in which this motion is made has been removed from the New York Supreme Court and is one brought by a holder of bonds issued by the State of Sao Paulo whereby he seeks payment of principal and interest.
The warrant of attachment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima, SA v. the NavemarSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lamont v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Puente v. Spanish Nat. StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Sullivan v. State of Sao PauloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Weilamann v. Chase Manhattan BankNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Republic of China v. Pang-Tsu MowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951
- Irving Trust Co. v. the MaliakosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.