Legal Opinion

Filley v. Illinois Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1914No. 18,497Published

OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*198The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

In view of the literature on file in this case, especially the somewhat emphatic petition for a second rehearing, it has been determined to reexamine the questions presented by the record, and the writer has been assigned the task of formulating the result.

It is mutually conceded and asserted that an ordinary old-line policy vests a personal interest in the beneficiary, hence no authorities need be cited in support of that proposition. Of course such vested interest arises from the contract, and the corollary follows that the obligations of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Tyler v. Odd Fellows' Mutual Relief Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. United States Casualty Co. v. KacerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. State v. Bankers' & Merchants' Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. Hatch v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API