Legal Opinion
Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Allmax Nutrition, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 26, 2017No. Case No.: 16-cv-01764-H-AGSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) GRANTING DEFENDANT ALL-MAX’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DEFENDANT HBS’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PARTIAL LEAVE TO AMEND; AND(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
On April 25, 2017, Defendant Allmax Nutrition, Inc. filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), and Defendant HBS International Corp. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Natural Alternatives International, Inc.’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. Nos. 43, 44.)…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gyro-Trac Corporation v. King Kong Tools LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Linden v. ResMed Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Rotor Blade LLC v. Signature Utility Services LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
- Smith Interface Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026