Legal Opinion

Smith Interface Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 28, 2026No. 3:23-cv-01187Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SMITH INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES, Case No.: 23-CV-1187 TWR (DTF) LLC, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, 13 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE v. PLEADINGS 14 APPLE INC., 15 (ECF No. 168) Defendant. 16 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Smith Interface’s Motion for Judgment on the 19 Pleadings (“Mot.,” ECF No. 168) as well as Defendant Apple’s Response in Opposition to 20 (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 176) and Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 182) the 21 Motion. The Court held a hearing on December…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API