Legal Opinion

Linden v. ResMed Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 30, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01291Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRAIG L. LINDEN, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1291-JES-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS 14 RESMED INC.; RESMED CORP.; and [ECF No. 9] RESMED HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff 19 filed an opposition, and Defendants filed a reply. ECF Nos. 15, 17. On March 12, 2025, 20 the Court held a hearing on the motion and took the matter under submission. ECF No. 19. 21 After due consideration and for the reasons…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API