Legal Opinion

Mole-Richardson Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1990No. B041706PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J. *

Appellant Franchise Tax Board appeals from a judgment granting refund of corporate franchise taxes paid for income years 1972 through 1975 by respondent Mole-Richardson Company. The question presented is whether under the factual circumstances of this case the activities of a corporation with diverse business enterprises carried on both within and without the state constitute one unitary business for income apportionment purposes. We hold that they do and affirm the judgment.

The case was submitted on stipulated facts and uncontradicted testimony that may be summarized as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. FW Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Dept. of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Talley Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. McCrary Construction Co. v. Metal Deck Specialists, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Tenneco West, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Giant Inland Empire R v. Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API