Legal Opinion
Macklin v. Mendenhall
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 30, 2009No. 1:08-cv-00884-LJO-TAGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (Doc. 13)
THERESA A. GOLDNER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Rebecca Macklin’s Motion for Protective Order (“Motion”) came on for *598hearing on March 30, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. before United States Magistrate Judge Theresa A. Goldner. Randall M. Rumph appeared personally on behalf of Plaintiff. Jesse J. Maddox appeared personally on behalf of Defendants Dale Mendenhall, Mark DeRosia, and the City of Delano. The Court has read and considered the pleadings and the arguments of counsel, and makes the following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Priest v. RotaryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ogden v. All-State Career SchoolDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Dapper v. Brinderson LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. DonohueDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- SIEDENTOPF v. WRIGHT AUTOMOTIVE BUDGET LOT, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Z.H. v. GarciaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024