Dapper v. Brinderson LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 STEPHANIE DAPPER, 8 Plaintiff, C23-0632 TSZ 9 v. MINUTE ORDER 10 BRINDERSON, LLC, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 13 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Plaintiff’s motion for protective order, docket no. 31, is GRANTED. A 14 district court has broad discretion to control discovery. Macklin v. Mendenhall,
257 F.R.D. 596, 601
(E.D. Cal. 2009) (citing Little v. City of Seattle,
863 F.2d 681, 685
(9th 15 Cir. 1988)). “Pursuant to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Macklin v. MendenhallDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Cockrum v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1996