Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Donohue
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2010, upon due consideration of plaintiffintervenor Moncel Deitz’s motion to quash and the parties’ submissions in conjunction therewith, IT IS ORDERED that the motion be, and the same hereby is, granted in part and denied in part. The motion is denied to the extent 1) the subpoena to Heritage Valley Health System is limited in scope to materials reflecting or relating to the positions held by plaintiff-intervenor and her pay rate, work schedule, hours worked (or other work options made available for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tracey D. Wolak v. Ferdinand J. Spucci, Individually, Dennis Carroll, Individually, and Village of Pelham Manor, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Priest v. RotaryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Mitchell v. HutchingsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- Barta v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.