Legal Opinion

Van Emmerik v. Montana Dakota Utilities Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1983No. 13614, 13615PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal from orders denying attorneys’ fees and summary judgments dismissing appellant’s actions upon the merits with prejudice. We affirm.

In March of 1979, appellant commenced a class action (Van Emmerik I) seeking a refund of sales taxes from the State and retailers of utility services for the collection of taxes in excess of the rate imposed by SDCL 10-45-6. In June of 1979, several investor-owned utilities brought administrative proceedings seeking a refund of excess sales taxes paid. In February of 1980, appellant commenced a separate action (Van…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jolicoeur Furniture Co., Inc. v. BaldelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  2. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Moulton v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In re the Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. RicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API