Legal Opinion

In re the Water Use Permit Applications

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2001No. 21309PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

On October 16, 2000, petitioners-appellants Waiáhole Waikáne Community Association, Hakipu‘u ‘Ohana, and Ka Láhui Hawaii (collectively, WWCA) and intervenor-appellant/cross-appellee Hawaii’s Thousand Friends (HTF) filed motions for attomej?s’ fees in connection with the instant appeal; WWCA filed an amended motion on October 20, 2000. See generally In re Water Use Applications, Petitions for Interim Instream Flow Standard Amendments, and Petitions for Water Reservations for the Waiāhole Ditch Combined Contested Case Hearing, 94…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kemp v. State Child Support Enforcement AgencyHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kaleikini v. Yoshioka.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Maui Tomorrow v. State, Board of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Marggieh Dicarlo v. Moneylion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API