Legal Opinion

Haralson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 8, 2008No. 3-05-CV-2513-BD, 3-06-CV-1075-BDPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFF KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) has filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, motion for judgment in this civil action brought by its insured, Virginia Haralson, seeking underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits under a standard Texas personal automobile policy. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I

On March 6, 2005, Fred Haralson sustained serious bodily injuries when the car he was driving collided with a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Giles v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murthy v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Agee v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  3. Watkins v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API