Agee v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARTY AGEE and CAROLINA AGEE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) VS. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND ) 3:22-CV-1697-G INDEMNITY COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss, docket entry 24, the third amended complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Agees’ request to abate their extra-contractual claims is also DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This is the court’s second memorandum opinion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid TransitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.