Legal Opinion
Henry v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 28, 2008No. AC 28916PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The plaintiff, Robert E. Henry, a member of the bar of this state, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the reprimand issued to him by the reviewing committee of the defendant, the statewide grievance committee, for violating rules 3.3 (a) (1) and 8.4 (4) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) the reviewing committee did not misapply the law when it determined that he had violated rules 8.4 (4) and 3.3 (a) (1), (2) the defendant presented sufficient evidence of violations of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Swenson v. SawoskaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-JonasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rodriguez v. E.D. Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Simms v. SeamanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Cohen v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. BurbankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Cohen v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.