Legal Opinion
MacHado v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 21, 2006No. AC 26107PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Arthur D. Machado, an attorney, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the reprimand issued to him by the defendant, the statewide grievance committee. The defendant affirmed the decision of its reviewing committee, reprimanding the plaintiff for violating rules 1.2 (a) 1 and 1.4 (a) 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence that he violated rules 1.2 (a) and 1.4 (a), (2) refused to consider an affidavit he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Salmon v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Maharishi School of Vedic Sciences, Inc. v. Connecticut Constitution Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MarquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- LeBlanc v. New England Raceway, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Host America Corp. v. RamseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Cohen v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Irving v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006