Legal Opinion
Matter of Hanks
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1981No. CA 16007, SC 26906PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*453PETERSON, J.
Virginia Hanks, a pro tempore court reporter, was held in contempt by the Court of Appeals for failing to file transcripts in five cases pending in the Court of Appeals. As "punishment for contempt,” the Court of Appeals imposed a five-day jail term and a $300 fine.1 We granted review.
THE FACTS
ORS 19.029(3),2 19.078,3 and 138.1854 require court reporters to file transcripts within 30 days after a notice of appeal is filed. Our Rule 2.05(1) requires that a copy of the notice of appeal be served "on the court reporter or reporters.” The appendix to this opinion lists five cases in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- STATE Ex Rel OREGON STATE BAR v. LENSKEOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Hathaway v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of Marriage of MannersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. KeenanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. McGlottenColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.