Legal Opinion
Pearl v. 305 East 92nd Street Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 5, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered July 13, 1989, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against defendants’ attorneys, Rosenberg & Estis, and granted plaintiff’s motion to disqualify Rosenberg & Estis as defendants' counsel, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the motion to dismiss the complaint as against Rosenberg & Estis granted, and the motion to disqualify the law firm denied, with costs.
This is a wrongful eviction action by a tenant against his erstwhile landlord, 305 East 92nd Street Corp. (305 Corp.), and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Green v. RozenholcAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Plotkin v. Interco Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Green v. FischbeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Art Capital Group, LLC v. NeuhausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Strongback Corp. v. N.E.D. Cambridge Avenue Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Celi Electrical Lighting, Inc. v. Sanders Construction Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013