Legal Opinion

Celi Electrical Lighting, Inc. v. Sanders Construction Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCHOENFELD, J.

Order entered December 15, 2011, modified to deny in its entirety plaintiffs motion to disqualify defense counsel; as modified, order affirmed, without costs. On the court’s own motion, the notice of appeal dated January 10, 2012 is deemed to be a notice of appeal by defendant Sanders Construction Corporation (see Matter of Tagliaferri v Weiler, 1 NY3d 605, 606 [2004]; Rosin v Weinberg, 107 AD3d 682, 683 [2013]).

At issue on this appeal is whether Civil Court abused its discretion in granting plaintiffs disqualification motion to the extent of disqualifying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tagliaferri v. WeilerNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Jamaica Public Service Co. v. AIU InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Hall Dickler Kent Goldstein & Wood, LLP v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Rowe v. De JesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Rosin v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API