Legal Opinion

Kenco Petroleum Marketers, Inc. v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1967No. 686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

U.S. Highway 29-70 Bypass, at the location in question on this appeal, is a controlled access facility. G.S. 136-89.49 (2).

There can be no doubt of the authority of the State Highway Commission, upon its finding that the construction and use of a driveway, affording direct access from adjoining property onto such highway, would be or is an obstruction to the free flow of traffic thereon, or a hazard to the safety of travelers upon the highway, to forbid the construction of the driveway or to prohibit its further use. G.S. 136-89.61; Hedrick v. Graham, 245 N.C. 249, 96 S.E. 2d 129. It is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Moses v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Snow v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Abdalla v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Haymore v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Prestige Realty Co. v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. City of Winston-Salem v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. French v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API