Legal Opinion

French v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1968No. 850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The provisions of the Right of Way Agreement executed by the plaintiff and his wife to the defendant, which are quoted in the foregoing statement of facts, are exactly the same as the corresponding provisions in the agreement which was before us in Petroleum Marketers v. Highway Commission, 269 N.C. 411, 152 S.E. 2d 508. There, we said:

“In determining whether the plaintiff had a property right which has been taken or destroyed by the resolution of the Highway Commission, we are not controlled by the provision in G.S. 136-89.52 [enacted after the execution of the agreements both in that case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Abdalla v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Williams v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Kenco Petroleum Marketers, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Furniture Co. of Conover, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Dep't of Transp. v. Fernwood Hill TownhomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. McNeill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API