Legal Opinion

J.A.M. Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 1990No. 896 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge.

J.A.M. Cab Company, Inc. (J.A.M.) appeals a Pennsylvania Utility Commission (Commission) order denying its petition for reconsideration of the Commission’s prior order which denied reinstatement of J.A.M.’s certificate of public convenience. We affirm.

In January 1985, the Commission issued a compliance order approving J.A.M.’s common carrier application, wherein it notified J.A.M. that its certificate of public-convenience would be issued when J.A.M. presented insurance and tariff evidence. At that time, J.A.M. was to present its vehicle for Commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Carbonaire Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. PP & L Industrial Customer Alliance v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Friends of the Atglensusquehanna Trail, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Exec. Transp. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API