State Bank v. Bilstad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Webster District Court. — Hon. R. M. Wright, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
A suit to recover on three promissory-notes executed by the defendant and Jno. M. Hetland. Two of the notes were drawn payable to the order of Fred B. Lawrence, and the other to the order of the plaintiff bank. No defense was interposed to the latter note, but counterclaims were pleaded as to the other two. The first question for determination is whether these two notes were negotiable. They both bore the same date, April 23, 1904, but one was due December 1, 1905, and the other December 1,1907. Both contained the following provision, however: “It is agreed that if crop on Secs. 25 and 26,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Voss v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Finley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Hubbard v. Robert B. Wallace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Utah State National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- First National Bank of Bridgeport, Connecticut v. BlackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Great Falls National Bank v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.