Legal Opinion

Sea Assoc. v. Planning Zoning Comm., No. Cv-89-0363109-S (Aug. 6, 1990)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 6, 1990No. CV-89-0363109-SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiff, Sea Associates, appeals, under the provisions of C.G.S. 8-28, from the decision of the defendant, the Windsor Locks Planning and Zoning Commission, disapproving a plan for the subdivision of property owned by the plaintiff and located at 31 South Elm Street in Windsor Locks.

FACTS

On December 12, 1988, the plaintiff submitted an application for a three lot subdivision of the property mentioned above. The commission published notices of a public hearing concerning the application,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Bossert Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Merlo v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API