White v. Greenwood
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action for the conversion of two thousand fruit trays, in which the defendants presented a counterclaim for one hundred dollars. The defendants had judgment that plaintiff take nothing and, also, judgment as prayed for under the counterclaim. The plaintiff appeals.
Appellant was the owner of real property in Kings County and respondents owned real property in Fresno County. They entered into a written agreement for the exchange of their respective holdings, as well as for the exchange of certain personal property. We set forth the portion of the instrument which is of present…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Field v. ShorbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- French v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- White v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- De Witt v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Black v. Richfield Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Hughes v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.