White v. Greenwood
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This controversy grows out of a contract made by the parties for an exchange of real and personal property whereby defendants claimed plaintiff sold and agreed to deliver to them, with the ranch so conveyed, some- two thousand fruit trays which at the time of the making of the contract were, and for a period of one year or more had been, in the possession of a third party upon another ranch and which trays defendants thereafter took into their possession.
Findings were waived and the court gave judgment for defendants, from which plaintiff appeals. Upon the record the only rulings that can be…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Busch v. BuschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Pierce v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Clarke & Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
- White v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Hartsock v. Kaskaskia Livestock InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.