Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Sullivant
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 2011No. B222278PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.
SUMMARY
Tina Freeman sought a civil harassment restraining order against Shari Sullivant, claiming that her lifelong friend had burglarized her home and made threats against Freeman, her mother, and her daughter. A temporary restraining order (TRO) was issued, and at the hearing on the petition, Sullivant’s appearance attorney sought a continuance, arguing that Sullivant’s retained counsel was otherwise engaged. The trial court denied the continuance, finding no “good cause” and, after giving the appearance attorney a short time to prepare, held the hearing. Finding clear and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- McComber v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- S. B. Beach Properties v. BertiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Organization of Deputy Sheriffs of San Mateo County, Inc. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Heller v. Pillsbury Madison & SutroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- York v. City of Los Angeles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bio-Tek Technology v. Queen's Dialysis Unit CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Chancellor v. Ozzello CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Cisneros v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Cisneros v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.