Legal Opinion

Di Rebaylio v. Herndon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1935No. Civ. 9297PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs who are husband and wife sued for personal injuries sustained by the wife in an automobile accident. It was stipulated that the accident was caused by the negligence of the defendant Herndon in operating an automobile owned by the defendant Franklin Motors, Inc. The jury returned verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendant Herndon, and, by direction of the court, a verdict in favor of the owner of the car and against the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment entered upon the directed verdict.

The first question presented is the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradford v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Union Trust Co. v. American Commercial Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Henrietta v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Elkinton v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Bayless v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API