Legal Opinion
State v. Milks
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 20, 1994No. C911976CR C911977CR CA A76124 (Control) CA A76125PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
In this consolidated criminal case, 1 defendants were charged with the manufacture, delivery and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. Before trial, defendants moved to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The court allowed the motion to suppress, finding that the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish probable cause. The state appeals, and we affirm.
On November 26, 1991, Washington County Sheriffs Deputy Allen received a telephone call from Peggy Stark reporting a marijuana growing operation. Stark told Allen that she was living with one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarlileOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Pelster/BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. BarrazaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.