Legal Opinion

State v. Barraza

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 2006No. 02092155; A124993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for manufacture of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of three marijuana plants found in his residence by a police officer. On review for errors of law, State v. Will, 131 Or App 498, 500, 885 P2d 715 (1994), we conclude that the evidence was discovered during a warrantless search conducted without probable cause, and we reverse and remand.

The facts are not in dispute. Deputy Duncan responded to a complaint about noise and “possibly teenagers partying” at defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. Rodriguez-GanegarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. MilksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. StockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. McHenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. EdmistonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API