State v. Barraza
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for manufacture of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of three marijuana plants found in his residence by a police officer. On review for errors of law, State v. Will, 131 Or App 498, 500, 885 P2d 715 (1994), we conclude that the evidence was discovered during a warrantless search conducted without probable cause, and we reverse and remand.
The facts are not in dispute. Deputy Duncan responded to a complaint about noise and “possibly teenagers partying” at defendant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. Rodriguez-GanegarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. MilksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. StockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. McHenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. EdmistonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009