Nash v. Weed & Duryea Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a prejudgment remedy in an action to recover unpaid commissions. The plaintiffs, Ronald Nash and Scaizo Realty, Inc., brought an action in several counts against the defendants, The Weed and Duryea Company, Peter G. Huidekoper, Jan E. Cohen and Arnold H. Foster, for breach of contract, unjust enrichment and tortious interference with the plaintiffs’ rights to commissions arising out of the sale of the business and assets of The Weed and Duryea Company. Pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278d,1 the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Greenberg, Rhein & Margolis, Inc. v. Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hotz Corp. v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Feldmann v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Mac's Car City, Inc. v. DiLoretoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Soltesz v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Greenberg v. Mortgage Services Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.