Tiedman v. Tiedman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
In this divorce action, the judge declared, at the conclusion of a hearing, that he would grant a divorce and approve the agreed-upon property settlement, and would sign a judgment of divorce. The husband died before the judgment was signed.
We hold that where it is contemplated that a judge’s oral statement, that a divorce is or will be granted, will be followed by the signing of a judgment, the divorce and property settlement do not become effective until the judgment is signed and cannot be made effective nunc pro tunc after one of the parties dies.
I
Barbara Tiedman commenced this action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Wilson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Blickle v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Heck v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Lewis v. Wayne County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- People v. MayhewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Workers' Compensation Agency Director v. MacDonald's Industrial Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Arbor Farms, LLC v. Geostar Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Monarch Leasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.