Legal Opinion

Tiedman v. Tiedman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1977No. 58101, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

In this divorce action, the judge declared, at the conclusion of a hearing, that he would grant a divorce and approve the agreed-upon property settlement, and would sign a judgment of divorce. The husband died before the judgment was signed.

We hold that where it is contemplated that a judge’s oral statement, that a divorce is or will be granted, will be followed by the signing of a judgment, the divorce and property settlement do not become effective until the judgment is signed and cannot be made effective nunc pro tunc after one of the parties dies.

I

Barbara Tiedman commenced this action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Wilson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Blickle v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Heck v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lewis v. Wayne County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. MayhewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Workers' Compensation Agency Director v. MacDonald's Industrial Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Arbor Farms, LLC v. Geostar Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Monarch Leasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API