Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Monarch Leasing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1996No. 95-1299PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge.

The defendants appeal from the district court’s award of summary judgment to the plaintiff in an action brought to renew a monetary judgment which was originally entered for the plaintiff in a 1984 diversity breach of contract case. The defendants contend that the plaintiff’s complaint in the instant case was not timely brought under the applicable Michigan statute of limitations. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts are undisputed. In 1982, Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) sued the defendants in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Tom Hammon v. Dhl Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Eric William KingsleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Wayne L. YashinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Slaughter v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API