Heck v. Bailey
Michigan Supreme Court
Case-made from Ingham; Collingwood, J. Bill by John J. Bailey against Dorothy M. Bailey for a divorce. Defendant filed a cross-bill for a divorce and alimony. Between the time of the hearing and the date of decree, plaintiff died, and George R. Heck, special administrator, was allowed to intervene in behalf of plaintiff’s estate. From a decree awarding alimony, plaintiff administrator appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Plaintiff, special administrator of the *55estate of John J. Bailey, deceased, was by order of the court permitted to intervene in and on behalf of all persons interested in said estate for the purpose of reviewing in this court the decree rendered in the court below. It appears that plaintiff’s decedent, John J. Bailey, on July 8, 1917, filed a bill for divorce in the circuit court for the county of Ingham against his wife, Dorothy M. Bailey, defendant. On the 9th day of July defendant filed an answer and cross-bill. In her cross-bill she charged plaintiff with extreme cruelty and nonsupport…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Zoellner v. ZoellnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Wilson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Judson v. JudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Tiedman v. TiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Kutchai v. KutchaiMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Jones v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Monarch Leasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.