Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Doms

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 24, 1999No. 971762-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Eugene E. Doms appeals for the second time the trial court’s denial of his request to rescind a real estate contract. Plaintiffs Ellen Anderson and Dan and Jeanne Scott cross-appeal, arguing, among other things, that the doctrine of laches bars recission of the contract. 1 Both parties appeal the trial court’s award of attorney fees and costs. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

¶2 In March 1982, plaintiffs Dan and Jeanne Scott, Ellen Anderson, and D.C. Anderson, Ellen Anderson’s now deceased husband, sold a parcel of property known as Rossi Hills (the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Child v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Cottonwood Mall Co. v. SineUtah Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. DomsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Vierig v. TherriaultCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  3. Nicolds v. Utah Bd. of Pardons and ParoleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Allen v. HallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. Rocky Mountain Hospitality v. Mountain ClassicUtah Supreme Court · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API