Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1940No. 3307PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR ALLOWANCES

OPINION

Two motions are before us arising out of a divorce proceeding instituted by respondent. Appellant cross-complained and was granted a decree of divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The first motion has been made by the wife for allowances to prosecute her appeal from specific parts of the decree concerning property awards, and the second motion has been made by the husband to dismiss the appeal. They were heard in that order at the same hearing.

The motion for allowances must be denied for the reason that it does not appear that an appeal has been perfected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamb v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hannah v. HannahNevada Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Afriat v. AfriatNevada Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bohl v. BohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  4. O'Loughlin v. O'LoughlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Basic Refractories, Inc. v. BrightNevada Supreme Court · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API