Laughter v. Powell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
All parties to this action concede that plaintiff must recover, if at all, under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U. S. C. A., sections 51-59) as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States. This was the theory of the trial in the Superior Corrrt.
Defendants, appellants, in the main, challenge the status of plaintiff as an employee. The question in this respect is raised by motions, aptly made, for judgment on the pleadings, and for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence, and by exception to the charge of the court on the trial below. Here…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Cobia v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- White v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Blanton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961