Legal Opinion

Bassett v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 27, 2011No. 10-3454PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

We must determine whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Rodger Bassett’s petition for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The act entitles a prevailing party to fees only if the position of the United States was not substantially justified. And the district court concluded that a reasonable person could think that the commissioner of Social Security acted with a rational basis in fact and law, not only in denying Bassett’s application for disability benefits in part, but also in unsuccessfully defending that portion of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Stewart v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Esther Marcus v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Michael E. Golembiewski v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Barbara Suide v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Nimmerrichter v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Amy L. A. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  4. Ashley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  5. Britton-Dillon v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API