Barbara Suide v. Michael Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Barbara Suide applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. An administrative law judge denied benefits, and the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration and the district court affirmed. We affirmed in part and reversed in part, finding no error in the conclusion that Suide did not qualify for benefits before her December 2006 stroke, but reversing and remanding the denial of benefits from that time forward because one of the ALJ’s key findings on Suide’s residual functional capacity simply was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stewart v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Suide v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forest v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
- Kaminski v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Kimbrough v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Noonan v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Smith v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.