Legal Opinion

United States v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1910No. 1,895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas. Action by the United States against the St. Uouis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas. From the judgment, the United States bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

SHEDBY, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover penalties under the safety appliance act (Act March 2, 1893, c. 196, § 6, 27 Stat. 531 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3175]), as amended by Act April 1, 3896, c. 87, 29 Stat. 85. After providing in the first section of the act that it shall be unlawful for any common carrier engaged in interstate commerce to use on its line any locomotive engine in moving interstate traffic not equipped with a power driving wheel brake and appliances for operating the train brake system, the following requirements are made as to the equipment of cars:

“See. 2. That…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Sturgis v. . SpoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Fisher v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Suydam v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  3. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1911
  5. Brady v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API