Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 7, 1938No. 324PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

Revenue Act of 1928, c. 852, § 293, 45 Stat. 791, provides, in dealing with assessment of deficiencies in income tax returns:

“(b) Fraud.—If any part of any deficiency is due to fraud with intent to evade tax, then 50 per centum of the total amount of the deficiency (in addition to such deficiency) shall be so assessed, collected and paid. . .

The question for decision is whether assessment of the addition is barred by the acquittal of the defendant on an indictment under § 146 (b) of the same Act for a wilfull attempt to evade and defeat the tax.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue found that…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. State v. DuboseSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  4. Standlee v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  5. Sorensen v. State Dept. of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API