Suydam v. . Smith
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The decision of the Commission of Appeals in the case ofRyder v. Smith is directly in point upon the main question involved in the present appeal, viz., whether Abram Barre was the proper officer to give the notice and make the order for the disobedience of which the penalties were recovered in this action. The Commission of Appeals determined that question in the affirmative, and sustained a recovery against the same defendant, as in this action, for other penalties incurred by the disobedience of the same order. Very strong reasons are required to induce us to review a decision of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sturgis v. . SpoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Fisher v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- The People v. . the New-York Central Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Fisher v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oriental Boulevard Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Griffin v. Interurban Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Topham v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- United States v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910
- Meyers Bros. Parking System, Inc. v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.