Legal Opinion

Heroff v. Metropolitan Transit Commission

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1985No. C1-85-107PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for a new trial. Appellant claims a new trial should have been granted because (1) the jury’s verdict was not supported by the evidence and (2) insufficient damages were awarded under the influence of passion or prejudice. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 2, 1981, appellant Patricia Heroff slipped and fell while walking down the front steps of a Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) bus in downtown St. Paul. Appellant boarded the bus near her home at the corner of 7th and Bay Street. She was a regular bus rider.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Wefel Ex Rel. Wefel v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Smith v. CarriereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. City of Ogema v. BevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rud v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Johnson v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Flanagan v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Rud v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API