Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Jensen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 10, 1989No. CO-88-1456PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants appeal from the denial of their motion for JNOV and for a new trial. They allege error in the jury instructions which allowed the imposition of both statutory treble compensatory damages and punitive damages. Respondents seek review from the denial of their motion for costs, disbursements, witness fees, and reasonable attorney fees.
We affirm.
FACTS
Respondents, Dean E. and Nancy A. Johnson, own a parcel of property located just northwest of the intersection of Interstate 35 and Highway 23 in Pine County, Minnesota. Respondents owned the property since April 20,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berg v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Donald v. MosesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Meixner v. BueckslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Bisher v. Homart Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Clifford v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Hunt v. HaddenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Johnson v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Lowther v. RigglemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission of Minneapolis & Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990